Mass r civ p 34. Massachusetts Superior Court Worcester County.

26, the SJC’s amendments are confined to section 26(c), concerning protective orders. Rule 5(d) Service and Filing of Pleadings and Other Papers. The amendment is patterned after Fed. 231 May 7, 2024 · See Mass. Cts. 45(d). 170, 178, 182 N. Below is a collection of all Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, which govern civil proceedings in the Commonwealth. 33(c) Reporter's notes (2003). Until the enactment of certain (1996) With the merger of the District Court Rules into the Mass. 26(b). Rule 34: Production of documents and things and entry upon land for inspection and other purposes Identical to Mass. 44. Except in actions to which G. Downloads for Domestic Relations This rule is identical to Mass. , the District Court version of Rule 41(b)(1) provided for dismissal for lack of prosecution after two years. / Mun. " Effective July 1, 1994, these matters can be found in the District/Municipal Courts Rules for Appellate Division Appeal. By statute (G. 3 is now applicable in the District Court. [Disclaimer] [Text of rule effective until January 1, 2014. Rowell, 34 Mass. 63 and Dist. Oct 25, 2016 · The Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) approved amendments to Mass. Civ. . Reporter's Notes (2009): The 2009 amendments reflect changes resulting from the adoption of the Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code. " Jun 27, 1974 · (1973) Rule 20(a) is the same as Federal Rule 20(a) except for: (1) the deletion of a reference to admiralty law, and (2) the addition of a reference to executions and costs taken from G. In an action in which any part of the relief sought is a judgment for a sum of money or the disposition of a sum of money or the disposition of any other thing capable of delivery, a party, upon notice to every other party, and by leave of court, may deposit with the court all or any part of such sum or thing. L. 208, § 34, applies, the court shall upon written motion made prior to final argument, providing either party or the court has requested appointment of a stenographer pursuant to Rule 18 or the trial was recorded electronically, find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law May 3, 1996 · Lewis, 383 Mass. 4(g) . 27, which incorporates by reference the provisions of Fed. D. P. Rule 44 does not cover the authentication of non-official records (as, e. This rule explains Any party may serve on any other party a request (1) to produce and permit the party This sentence is consistent with Fed. See Fed. Billings v. (h) Certain actions in Probate Courts: Service Notwithstanding any other provision of these rules, in actions in the Probate Courts in the nature of petitions for instructions or for the allowance of accounts, service may be made in accordance with G. P 53(d) (e) Powers Subject to the specifications and limitations stated in the order of reference, the master has and shall exercise the power to regulate all proceedings in every hearing before him and to do all acts and take all measures necessary or proper for the efficient performance of his duties under the order. 34, thirty (30) days written notice must be given to all parties to the action, although the court may allow for a longer or shorter time. Jul 1, 1996 · The revision of paragraph (a) [now Mass. 801, 422 N. Massachusetts practice is more liberal than Federal Rule 15(c) in allowing amendments adding or substituting party defendants after expiration of the period of limitations. A subpoena is unnecessary to compel a party to appear or to produce documents at Jan 16, 1979 · Identical to Mass. 19(a) (b) Determination by court whenever joinder not feasible If a person as described in subdivision (a)(1)-(2) hereof cannot be made a party, the court shall determine whether in equity and good conscience the action should proceed among the parties before it, or should be dismissed, the absent person being thus (1996) With the merger of the District Court rules into the Mass. If an objection to the admission of evidence is sustained, the proponent of the evidence should make an offer of proof, to preserve the record. 1136, 1137 (1892). 51 May 3, 1996 · The "Comments" to now-repealed Rule 42(b) of the Dist. These differences were found in Rule 65(b)(2) (reference to jury trial) and Rule 65(e) (labor disputes). PDF. /Mun. That is, notwithstanding the “reliance” provision in Rule 55. May 7, 2024 · If a party does not think it will be able to obtain service within the 90 day period, a timely motion can be made for "cause shown" for an enlargement of time pursuant to Mass. (1973): Rule 63 closely follows Federal Rule 63 with the following additions: (1) The enumerated disabilities have been expanded specifically to May 7, 2024 · The amendment brings the Massachusetts Rule closer to the wording of Fed. , by utilizing a system of record-keeping which conceals rather than discloses relevant records, or makes it unduly difficult to identify or locate them, thus rendering the production of the documents an excessively A person could intervene in Massachusetts only upon a showing that he had a substantial interest in the subject matter of the litigation (Check v. " Comments should be directed to Christine P. 233, § 79). The amendment makes the rule consistent with Fed. It had previously been held by the Supreme Judicial Court that Rule 65. Jul 1, 1974 · (1996) With the merger of the District Court rules into the Mass. (1996) Rule 27(a)(1) has been amended to add a reference to the District Court in the relevant judicial district to take into account the applicability of the Rules to the District Court and Boston Municipal Court. 34(a). 5(b), this means that he need only place the answers in the mail before the deadline. Amended May 3, 1996, effective 7/1/1996; November 28, 2007, effective 3/1/2008. " Because existing practice seems to have worked so well, and because the requirement of prior court (1996) With the merger of the District Court rules into the Mass. (1973) Rule 58 tracks Federal Rule 58 and works a substantial change in Massachusetts practice. The amendment should aid parties and the courts in meeting the time standards promulgated by the Supreme Judicial Court. c. 1 and Mass. (1973): Rule 41(a) provides for voluntary Nov 25, 2008 · (1996) With the merger of the District Court civil rules into the Mass. , Rule 65. Mann, 156 Mass. burak@sjc. 52(c)] evidences the decision not to follow the MRCP procedure of requiring an automatic set of judicial findings of fact and conclusions of law in every case tried without a jury. When a deposition notice to a party is accompanied by a document production request pursuant to Mass. (17 Pick. Subject to the following provisions, by notice of In a foreign country, depositions may be taken (1) on notice before a person authorized to administer oaths in the place in which the examination is held, either by the law thereof or by the laws of the United States, or (2) before a person commissioned by the court, and a person so commissioned shall have the power by virtue of his commission to administer any necessary oath and take May 7, 2024 · In light of the adoption of the Massachusetts Rules of Electronic Filing (Mass. g. Massachusetts Superior Court Worcester County. Rule 43(c) is similar to prior Massachusetts practice. See 2013 Reporter's Notes to Mass. (2007): The 2007 amendments to Rule 1 make the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure applicable to proceedings in the Juvenile Court where equitable relief is sought. 869 (D. (1996) With the merger of the District Court Rules into the Mass. 1. His rights were considered equitable in nature, entitling him to bring the action only in the insured's name. 54 and Dist. Supp. e. Rule 10(e) was added in 2010 to recognize the existing practice by which some attorneys include text on both the front and back of a page. 215, § 46 , in such manner and form as the court may Sears, Roebuck & Co. R. 231, § 69. P. , 308 Mass. The incorporation of the civil practice form of requests for and objection to instructions into criminal practice is felt to be appropriate because the same basic principles apply to both types of proceedings. Comments may also be emailed to christine. 60(b)(6). The March 2008 amendments were part of a group of amendments to the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure in light of the adoption of the statewide one-trial system for civil cases. Whenever the term "District Court" is used in the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, the reference is to be construed as including the Boston Municipal Court, unless "the context means something to the contrary. (1973) Rule 63 closely follows Federal Rule 63 with the following additions: (1) The enumerated disabilities have been expanded specifically to include Rule 26 - General Provisions Governing Discovery (a) Discovery Methods. , minor differences which had existed between Mass. In all cases a motion to intervene was addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the presiding judge; his decision would not be reversed Massachusetts court procedure is governed by a series of rules and orders. Jun 5, 2003 · Identical to Mass. 30 May 7, 2024 · The scope and procedure for requests for production of documents and responses thereto shall be made as permitted and as required by Mass. E. May 7, 2024 · (1994): Prior to this amendment, there was an anomaly in Mass. 45 align the Massachusetts rule more closely to the federal rule, important differences remain. 65 have been eliminated. Its provisions should be read in connection with M. (1973) Rule 48 is the same as Federal Rule 48. 26(b)(1), the expansive definition of “documents” found in the previous version of Mass. 2d 1353 (1981), in which a plaintiff, whose counsel averred that he had never received notification of a call of the list nor of entry of judgment, had the judgment vacated almost two years after judgment pursuant to Mass. (A) Video-Conferencing Deposition. Process to enforce a judgment for the payment of money shall be a writ of Mar 7, 2002 · If on motion under this rule judgment is not rendered upon the whole case or for all the relief asked and a trial is necessary, the court at the hearing of the motion, by examining the pleadings and the evidence before it and by interrogating counsel, shall if practicable ascertain what material facts exist without substantial controversy and what material facts are actually and in good faith (2023) This amendment responded to the Supreme Judicial Court opinion in Ashe v. Kaplan, 280 Mass. Under GL c. 34, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database. For rule effective January 1, 2014, see below. Comments received will be made available to the public. governing class actions is made applicable to District Court proceedings. A party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served and prior to entry of an order of dismissal or, if the pleading is one to which no responsive pleading is permitted and the action has not been placed upon the trial calendar, he may so amend it at any time within 20 days after it is served. (1973) Rule 50(a) is patterned upon Federal Rule 50(a), with the first sentence revised for clarity. See also 8A Smith and Zobel, Massachusetts Practice--Rules Practice, § 77. This prior amendment was part of a Jul 8, 2015 · Although the amendments to Mass R. 10 regarding maximum size for electronic documents and legibility considerations. A party may serve upon any other party a written request for admission, for purposes of the pending action, only, of the truth of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b) set forth in the request that relate to statements or opinions of fact or of the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of any documents described in the request. 39. The Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure are applicable in summary process actions only if they are not inconsistent with the Uniform Summary Process Rules (see Uniform Summary Process Rule 1), and the provisions of the latter set of rules regarding filing of discovery are now inconsistent with Mass. 15. Where papers are served by mail, these time periods are extended by 3 days in accordance with Mass. Identical to Mass. 26(b)(4)(A)(i) regarding any expert who is retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in the case or one whose duties as the party's employee regularly involve giving expert testimony and whose testimony is to be presented at trial shall be signed by the expert so disclosed. May 3, 1996 · (2009) The 2009 amendments reflect changes resulting from the adoption of the Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code. See MASS. ” Mass. 9. 1949). G. state. , (a) Effect. 63 have been eliminated. "The work product doctrine, drawn from the well-known case of Hickman v. , Rule 49 has been made applicable to the District Court, to the extent that Massachusetts law permits trial by jury in District Court civil actions. Oct 26, 2016 · In addition to the signature of the party, every disclosure called for by Mass. 234, §§ 34A and (1973) Rule 44, like Federal Rule 44, deals only with the problems of (1) authenticating an official record, and (2) establishing the lack of such record. ) (Supreme Judicial Court Rule 1:25, effective September 1, 2018), Rule 6(e) has been added to provide for an additional three days to respond or to take action after a document has been served electronically, similar to the additional three days applicable Oct 1, 2018 · 1 and G. ma. The 2009 amendment to Rule 33(a)(6) corrects an oversight in the March 2008 amendments by correcting the cross-references to Rule 55(b) that are found in Rule 33(a Mass. 34, as amended, 385 Mass. us. E. 4(a). 34(a)(1) and (b); provided, however, that the time limits specified in this rule shall govern. 1, sixth definition. 9 regarding format and content and Mass. Since depositions will no longer be filed in court, except as otherwise ordered by the court, this amendment requires the officer who takes responses at depositions upon written questions to "deliver or send the deposition to the party taking the deposition. 8(e) (f) Construction of pleadings In February, 1986, a judge ordered Roxse Homes to produce documents, all of which Roxse Homes had declined to produce in response to the partnership's November, 1985, request pursuant to Mass. 305, 308 (1932)). 231, § 4A. Rule 69 - Execution. It liberalizes the Identical to Mass. Mass. 1976) ("defendant may not excuse itself from compliance with Rule 34, Fed. S. The amendment's purpose is to increase compliance with discovery orders, by making it easier for parties to achieve, and judges to award, sanctions for the failure to comply with a discovery order. 6(a) May 3, 1996 · Mass. By countenancing enlargement of appeal time up to one year after entry of the order or judgment appealed from, Appellate Rule 14(b) relaxes the cognate F. 26(b)(3). 293, 314 (2009), quoting Mass. Cts. 12. 27 Amended May 3, 1996, effective 7/1/1996; amended June 24, 2009, effective 7/1/2009. (1973) Rule 41(a) provides for voluntary dismissal This requirement clashes squarely with Massachusetts practice. " Dec 13, 1981 · At any time after commencement of the action a defending party, as a third-party plaintiff, may (except in cases of registration and confirmation in the Land Court brought pursuant to G. 55(b)(2) (i. Oct 10, 1997 · (2003) The amendment to Rule 5(d) is in response to the amendment to Mass. They were part of a series of amendments concerning discovery of electronically stored information. 30(b)(4) as amended January 1, 1981 (5) The notice to a party deponent may be accompanied by a request made in compliance with Rule 34 for the production of documents and tangible things at the taking of the deposition. May 7, 2024 · Comcast Corp. dealt with "Preservation of Issues and Appeal to the Appellate Division. 50. 4(j), but the Massachusetts amendment prescribes a 90 day limit, rather than the 120 days in the Federal Rules, in order to further aid in the timely disposition of cases. 30 with Fed. In the District Court, the action shall be designated upon the docket as a jury action in accordance with the statutory provisions governing trials by jury in the District Court. 494 (1950). Reporter's Notes (2008): A 2008 amendment to Rule 12 added a new numbered defense, 12(b)(10), improper amount of damages in the Superior Court, District Court, and Boston Municipal court. (1973) Prior Massachusetts practice in the area of class suits was governed entirely by case law. Rule 34: Production of documents and things and entry upon land for inspection and other purposes. 36. (1983): This amendment makes clear that one cannot circumvent the time periods in Rule 30(b)(5) and Rule 34(b) by serving a deposition subpoena duces tecum on another party. Dec 14, 2011 · In all cases not governed by the Mass. 45(d)(1) provides that prior to the service of a “documents only” subpoena on a third person, a copy of the subpoena must be served on all parties to the case. L May 7, 2024 · Reporter's Notes--2022 In 2020, the Standing Advisory Committee on the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, charged with the task of reviewing and recommending to the Rules Committee of the Supreme Judicial Court amendments to the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, published for comment proposed amendments to Mass. 4(j) also permits a party to "show good cause why such service was not made within" the 90 day period. May 7, 2024 · (1996): Prior to the merger of the District Court Rules into the Mass. A. (2021) In light of the adoption of the Massachusetts Rules of Electronic Filing (Mass. 2d 282, 286-287 (1941). Subsequent to the commencement of any personal action under these rules, except actions only for specific recovery of goods and chattels, for malicious prosecution, for slander or libel, or for assault and battery, trustee process may be used, in the manner and to the extent provided by law, but subject to the requirements of this rule, to secure satisfaction of (1996): With the merger of the District Court rules into the Mass. Compare Fed. It is not necessary to aver the capacity of a party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity or the legal existence of an organized association of persons that is made a party. " Mass. United Mineral Lands Corp. Civ. 42(d)) does not contain the power of one District Court to separate claims or issues in a case before it and order that any such claims or issues be heard in a different Massachusetts Civil Procedure Rule 34: Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering Onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes. The trial of all issues so demanded shall be by jury, unless (1) the parties or their The Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure are applicable in summary process actions only if they are not inconsistent with the Uniform Summary Process Rules (see Uniform Summary Process Rule 1), and the provisions of the latter set of rules regarding filing of discovery are now inconsistent with Mass. 69. 1948), reversed on other grounds, 172 F. Rel. The practice developed of utilizing the law applicable to the proof of such In 2013, however, an amendment to Rule 4(a) of the Massachusetts Rules of Appellate Procedure provided that a Rule 60 motion, if served within ten days after entry of judgment, tolls the time period to claim an appeal. 495 (1947), is intended to enhance the vitality of an adversary system of litigation by insulating counsel's work from intrusions, inferences, or borrowings by other parties as Turner v. The proposed amendment adds language to Mass. Crim. 5(d). ) (Supreme Judicial Court Rule 1:25, effective September 1, 2018), Rule 6(e) has been added to provide for an additional three days to respond or to take action after a document has been served electronically, similar to the additional three days May 3, 1996 · Prior to July 1, 1994, Rule 64 of the Dist. As result of the merger, the three year provision of the Mass. Effective 7/1/1974. F. 65 and Dist. Jul 1, 1974 · (2014) The 2014 amendments are the first amendments to Rule 16 since the adoption of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure in 1973. Timing When Accompanied By a Document Production Request. 37(a)(4). 218, s. As stated in the 2015 Reporter's Notes to Mass. May 15, 1979 · Appellate Rule 14(a), dealing with computation of time, follows Mass. 6(b)(1). P 34(a), and the reference to “electronic storage locations” in Superior Court Standing Order 1-09(c)(3) all suggest that ESI should be discoverable. 78. (4) Motions except motions for summary judgment (i) Time for service of opposition Jan 30, 1989 · (1989) This amendment is necessitated by the amendment to Mass. Dom. 51. Download . See Gray v. The statewide one-trial statute provides in G. Any party may serve on any other party a request (1) to produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on his behalf, to inspect and copy, any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono-records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if Oct 1, 1998 · (1996) With the merger of the District Court rules into the Mass. Roxse Homes thereupon came forward with some but not all requested documents. ] (a) Scope. 792 (1974), require production of documents that “are in the possession, custody or control of the party upon whom the request is served. 4, § 7 and any other day appointed as a holiday by the President or the Congress of the United States or designated by the laws of the Commonwealth. , hospital records under G. 203, 205, 30 N. 37(b), upon which it was patterned. 13(c) (d) Counterclaim against the Commonwealth These rules shall not be construed to enlarge beyond the limits now fixed by law the right to assert counterclaims or to claim credits against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or a political subdivision thereof, or any of their officers and agencies. United States, 77 F. There shall be a complaint and (except as provided by law) an answer, and a trustee's answer under oath if trustee process is used; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such, an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim; a third-party complaint, if a person who was not an original party is summoned under the provisions of Rule 14; and a third-party answer, if a third If a deponent fails to answer a question propounded or submitted under Rules 30 or 31, or a corporation or other entity fails to make a designation under Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a), or a party fails to answer an interrogatory submitted under Rule 33, or if a party, in response to a request for inspection submitted under Rule 34, fails to respond . , 73 F. (1973) Rule 37 substantially follows Federal Rule 37. 26, effective July 1, 2016, but unlike the recent and substantial amendments to Fed. Shawmut Woodworking & Supply, Inc. , in all non-“sum certain” default cases) are required, under the provisions of that rule and related case law, to determine the plaintiff’s entitlement to the amount claimed before entering a Jan 7, 2014 · The broad scope of discovery permitted by Mass. Sep 1, 1981 · Identical to Mass. 54 have been eliminated. The Massachusetts rule is set out in detail in Wadsworth v. , Rule 50 has been made applicable to the District Court, to the extent that Massachusetts law permits trial by jury in District Court civil actions. Reporter's Notes (2010). The amendment is intended to relieve the parties and court personnel of the burdens involved with the filing of interrogatories and answers with the court. Boston Gas Company, 352 Mass. 1, "The purpose of the change was to acknowledge that both the court and the parties have the obligation to employ the rules for the purposes set forth. G. Mass. Prior to the promulgation of this rule, no statute or rule expressly provided for the proof of official records in criminal cases. 73, 76 (D. Deposition Notice . 30A which was effective January 1, 1981. In furnishing further answers to interrogatories, however, he is Jul 1, 1974 · At common law in Massachusetts, the subrogee had no right to sue the tortfeasor in his own name. The first paragraph, relating to motions for orders to compel discovery which are granted, says "the court may, after opportunity for hearing, require" the payment of reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, "incurred in obtaining the order. Moreover, Mass. 2. 23(e)(3) requiring that before entry of judgment or before any hearing approving a compromise that creates residual funds, the plaintiff must provide notice to the Massachusetts IOLTA Committee at least 30 days before the entry of judgment or the hearing. 1(c), judges conducting assessment hearings under Mass. May 7, 2024 · Mass. 3 was not applicable in the District Court, although the provisions thereof might have been applied by analogy in District Court civil contempt As used in this rule and in Rule 77(c), "legal holiday" includes those days specified in Mass. Granito, 326 Mass. 529 (2022). 4. Taylor , 329 U. 58 have been eliminated. 58 and Dist. 6(d). The requirements for maintaining a class suit in Massachusetts May 7, 2024 · Mass. Read Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering Onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes, Mass. 1 The situation appears to be different for judges. 34(a), 365 Mass. R. Reporter's Notes: (1973): Rule 36, tracking amended Federal Rule 36, governs Requests for Admission, a procedure long familiar to Massachusetts practitioners as "Notices to Admit", GL c. May 3, 1996 · When trial by jury has been demanded as provided in Rule 38, the action shall be designated upon the docket as a jury action. Burak, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, One Pemberton Square, Boston, MA 02108 on or before January 31, 2020. 2d 807, 809-810 (1967) in the following language: “. Amended November 28, 2007, effective 3/1/2008, May 6, 2008, effective 7/1/2008. In Ashe, the court requested the Standing Advisory Committee on the Rules of Civil Procedure “to consider whether an amendment or other guidance to rule 35 is in order consistent with this opinion” (footnote 9). These differences were based on the lack of civil jury trials in the District Court. 34(a) governs RFPs in Massachusetts Superior Court, and it states that a party may serve on any other party a request to inspect and copy documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things, or to permit entry onto designated land or property for the purpose of inspecting the property. , 453 Mass. Proposed Amendments to Mass. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods except as otherwise provided in Rule 30(a) and Rule 30A(a), (b): depositions upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land or other property, for inspection and May 7, 2024 · In originally answering interrogatories, the responding party has 45 days, and in which to serve a copy of the answers and objections; because service is complete upon mailing, Mass. Jul 1, 1974 · (1996) Prior to the merger of the District Court Rules into the Mass. 531, 539, 33 N. 1209 (1982). As in federal practice under Rule 19, under Massachusetts equity practice if a person who should join as a plaintiff refused to do so, he would be made a party-defendant. A remote deposition may be taken using a video -conferencing platform or by telephone. The time periods prescribed below apply unless a different time period is set by statute or order of the court. 86, 88-89, 223 N. Oct 26, 2023 · Mass. describe the District Court provisions by noting that District Court Rule 42(b) (now Mass. , Rule 23 of the Mass. now applies in the District Court. 185) cause a summons and complaint to be served upon a person who is or may be liable to him for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against him. Rule 34: Production of documents and things and entry upon land for inspection and other May 7, 2024 · Read Rule 34 - Production of Documents and Things and Entry upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes, Mass. A. As amended through May 7, 2024 . Mass R. ) 490, 498 (1835), subject only to the trial judge's sound discretion, Commonwealth v. 231 § 72, "[p]arties may make agreements relative to amendments and the time of filing papers, which shall be equivalent to an order of the court to the same effect. (1996) With the merger of the District Court rules into the Mass. Rule 34: Production of documents and things and entry upon land for inspection and other purposes ; Identical to Mass. 6. , Rule 48 has been made applicable to the District Court, to the extent that Massachusetts law permits trial by jury in District Court civil actions. 30 (b) Notice of the deposition; other formal requirements … (4) By Remote Means. Reporter's Note: (2008): A new second sentence has been added to Rule 39(a) to deal with statutory requirements in the District Court regarding designating an action on the docket as a jury action. 2d 737 (1st Cir. It Requests for discovery pursuant to Mass. , 489 Mass. uz if sn yk jm td mn nc xc pc